One camera I'm looking at is the Oneplus 7T Pro. Diffraction will reduce that advantage in real resolving power. So, diffraction aside, the telephoto only has a 1.86x advantage in image scale. The ratio of the focal lengths is 1.33 and the ratio of the pixel sizes is 1.4. In fact, the only reason I even suggest this is because I don't visually see the camera switching to the second module until you hit somewhere around 1.8x zoom.
#Adobe dng converter 11.4 full
The only reason I can think for doing this is that sparse PDAF performance isn't good enough (I have experienced it to misfocus / fail in low light or backlit situations), or perhaps the 'zoomed in' lens doesn't cover the full imaging area of the secondary sensor (which I calculate to be 4.68 x 3.5 um, or 1/3.09" type). That's a very small zoom ratio, and this choice will limit the performance of higher zoom ratios.Īlso, Portrait Mode takes a 1.5x crop of the main sensor. Particularly perplexing is that the EXIF data indicates the 'zoomed in' lens is only 43mm equiv., which would make it only a 1.6x zoom. But I will not be hesitant to just use the Pixel 4 where that makes sense.įrom DPReview I would like to see some "expert" results comparing JPG to RAW with Lightroom. I won't give up my Nikon camera anytime soon as there are the many predictable advantages. The active HDR is neat but I haven't really examined the results enough to give a firm opinion.Īnyway you can see the results for yourselves. The results are in jpg so, although I always shoot RAW with Nikon or Fuji, I have not really seen much advantage with the Pixel 4 yet. I have used Night Sight a lot and find it's excellent if there is not a lot of action. I have had the Pixel 2 for 2 years and have just updated to the Pixel 4 based on positive success in Paris. I usually carry a Nikon or Fuji camera with various lenses. I was pleased to have only the Pixel 2 on recent trip to Paris. Kind of impossible when P3 and P3A didn't have a second camera with a different resolution. (so using dcpTool was a good idea, just not your choice of source data.) However as I've already said, the profile from 7.2 DNGs can be pulled and applied to DNGs saved with 7.1. Now the 7.1 profile was SO bad that doing this might be an improvement, but that's because the 7.1 DNG profile sets the bar so horrendously low. This would be a really horrible idea because more likely than not the Pixel 3 has a different sensor and CFA. Or just use the Pixel 3 profile in RawTherapee. It looks like the current DNG Converter 11.4.1 doesn't have Pixel 4 DCP profiles, so you'd have to decompile a Pixel 3 Adobe Standard profile with DCPtool, re-name it to Pixel 4, and recompile it to be able to use it in Lr/ACR. I'll check with Adobe if they've included their own profiles.